<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>triptych on Posters.org</title>
    <link>https://posters.org/tags/triptych/</link>
    <description>Recent content in triptych on Posters.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://posters.org/tags/triptych/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How the Triptych Outlived the Altarpiece, From Bosch to Bacon to the Documentary Frame</title>
      <link>https://posters.org/how-the-triptych-outlived-the-altarpiece-from-bosch-to-bacon-to-the-documentary-frame/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://posters.org/how-the-triptych-outlived-the-altarpiece-from-bosch-to-bacon-to-the-documentary-frame/</guid>
      <description>Three frames from a protest, stacked one above the other. No hinges, no gold, no saints, nothing devotional anywhere in it. It still reads as a triptych, and the reason has almost nothing to do with the subject and everything to do with what the format asks the viewer to do.
A single picture asks you to look. Three panels ask you to compare. That sounds like a small difference. It is the whole engine of the form.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
